Case
Actions
• Identified Twin Cities metro area properties out to St. Cloud, Belle Plaine and Eau Claire, Wisconsin
• Determined ownership was preferred due to structural improvements required and capital equipment to be installed
• Provided financial analysis to demonstrate acquisition and redevelopment was less expensive than new build-to-suit construction
• Met with civic leaders to identify and negotiate city, county and state incentives
• While MFI believed a few of the toured facilities could be acceptable with some sacrifice by MFI, TaTonka was not satisfied that the right solution was on the table. Employing tenacity and creativity, TaTonka identified and presented a unique solution – a building in Chaska that was occupied and not even listed for sale
• Obtained proposals from four developers and one landlord creating a competitive environment for the developers and municipal incentives
• Built financial analysis/deal point matrix including variables such as net rent, operating costs, moving expenses, construction costs, site costs, rent constant, etc. to compare the alternative opportunities
Results
Recognizing the Chaska building was underutilized and the existing tenant was likely to move, TaTonka convinced the owner that selling in advance to avoid vacancy risk would be prudent. TaTonka also convinced the existing tenant that by moving to a smaller facility 3 years prior its lease expiration, it would reduce its occupancy costs immediately – even after paying a sizeable termination fee.
• TaTonka negotiated an aggressive price based on the sellers vacancy risk
• Application of the termination fee reduced the acquisition price even further
• Trucking/delivery, waste water treatment, and operational objectives were met, ultimately increasing MFI’s productivity and profits
• Minnesota Commercial Association of Realtors awarded TaTonka the Industrial Transaction of the Year for this project